Showing posts with label health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label health. Show all posts

Saturday, March 26, 2016

SOCIETY BENEFITS



Now here’s an interesting article;
 
“Canterbury's mental health funding to be cut” [ASHLEIGH STEWART, stuff.co.nz, 16  February 2016]

And here’s another  . ..

“11,000 disabled children lose welfare benefit” [NZ Herald, 19 March 2015]

Aaaannnd another  . . .

“Benefits cut for 13,000 parents in new regime” [Simon Collins, NZ Herald], 23 October 2013]

Starting to see a pattern?

I had the misfortune to have to go to a Work and Income New Zealand (WINZ) office recently to secure a particular allowance for someone.  I have to add that this was only because I was thrown off the phone by WINZ’s automatic phone system that didn’t have enough capacity for its “customers”;

“I’m sorry, but our lines are all busy.  Please try again later …  [beep, beep, beep]”

So I’m at the WINZ reception desk, and I go to hand in a form that is signed by a doctor and another relevant health professional.

Receptionist; “Have you been with us before?"
Me; “Me? Yes, but not for many years.”
Receptionist; “Then you need to fill in this form and make an appointment.”
Me; “Why?”
Receptionist; “Because you’re applying for ‘Extra Help.’”

So I had brought in, what I thought was, a simple two-page form completed and signed by a GP and another health professional.  That wasn’t enough.  A 28-page form (yes, honest - 28 pages!) was thrust in my hand and I was told to go away and come back another day.  I’m not even going to start on why the quake-traumatised person's allowance I was advocating for should have been easy.  It wasn’t.  It's suffice to say that eight years of a right-wing, National government were in absolute clarity at that moment.

I felt sick, heavy and dizzy.  Everything slowed down . . .

I took a deep breath, held it for a moment, then breathed out slowly and looked around at the “customers” in that office.   I didn’t see any stereotypical scruffy dole dodgers with their tin cups out to beg.  No drug addicts, drunks or half-starved dogs. The people in there were all quite smart, respectable and the place was deathly quiet.  The one unifying factor that all the visitors had, was the same look.  In fact, a lot of people in Christchurch have that look now.  All the visitors in that WINZ office had the look; stressed, tired and “I don’t really want to be here.”

Eight years of a National government, and benefits – any benefit – are extremely difficult to secure.  Eight years of a National government, and you have jump through hoops to receive what you’re actually entitled to.  But of course, eight years of a National government has made “entitlement” a swear word, hasn’t it?  The greed of the National Party's sponsors and supporters have ensured that every drop of social service is squeezed to alleviate the government's screaming debt crisis.  I mean, God-forbid we raise income tax at the higher end to maintain a civilised society,  right?

You know, as I stood in the queue and looked around, I didn’t see any bludgers.  Next time you're passing a WINZ office, go in and have a look yourself. Spend some time in there and take in what you see.  

See what I saw.  

I saw a lot of vulnerable, desperate people, asking for help.  

But they weren’t getting it.

All because the rich don’t like paying tax.

Monday, November 3, 2014

THE MAORI PARTY'S HAD THE SNIP



Now here’s an interesting article:

"Maori Party focused on rebuild"  [NZ Herald, Saturday 1 November 2014]

I'm a little concerned if Te Ururoa Flavell (pictured left) truly doesn't understand why his party has lost support.  He says he doesn't understand comments about the party turning its back on Maori.  Or perhaps he’s just spinning, because the truth is too dangerous to admit.  Whether he likes it or not, the perception out there seems to be that his target voters are not as comfortable with buddying-up to the right-wing National Party as Flavell is.  If Flavell were to admit all that, he’d be admitting he’s out of touch with his voters.  And that, my friends, is called “Political Suicide.”

However, Flavell is up against John Key.  And Key is an exceptionally intelligent and astute political animal.  Key knew that the best way to neuter the Maori movement was the same way any establishment neuters a radical movement: he offeres “crumbs from the rich man’s table” [Luke 16:19-31].  Helen Clarke foolishly dismissed and underestimated the strength of the Maori movement.  John Key did not.  In fact, Clarke arrogantly took the Maori votes and the Maori seats for granted.   John Key would love to do away with Maori seats, but dare not.  Helen Clarke foolishly stated that there was “no child poverty in New Zealand.”  Cleverly, John Key said there WAS child poverty in New Zealand – he just doesn’t want to do anything about it.   The former Maori Party leader, Pita Sharples, claims the Maori Party has achieved much for Maori since aligning itself with the National Party;  

  • “influence on the poverty committee”
  • “paid parental [leave]"
  • “free medicine at the doctors for the young”
Strangely enough, Sharples won’t be drawn on if he would have secured more for Maori in a Labour coalition, or whether the “achievements” above would have happened in committee as a matter of course. I would suggest to you that health, poverty, obesity, and smoking are the issues pressing for Maori, not crumbs or the damn flag:

The reality for Flavell, is that many of the issues above - that SHOULD concern Maori leaders deeply - will NOT be addressed by this corporate-friendly National Government.  This government will NOT be taken to account by the current Maroi-National arrangement.

John Key has done a superb job, in completely fracturing the left vote.  Key must be laughing his socks off at Labour being squeezed in between National and the Greens, as Labour feels it should go right not left.  However, Key may have watched the Maori Party strip the Maori seats from Labour, with perhaps some concern.  Hence, Key must have pondered on how he can neutralise this growing, pervasive force for change.